New names:
Rows: 48895 Columns: 16
── Column specification
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Delimiter: "," chr
(5): name, host_name, neighbourhood_group, neighbourhood, room_type dbl (10):
del...1, del...3, latitude, longitude, price, minimum_nights, num... date (1):
last_review
ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data. ℹ
Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.
• `del` -> `del...1`
• `del` -> `del...3`
Generated by summarytools 1.0.1 (R version 4.2.1) 2022-12-23
Briefly describe the data
We have NYC Air BnB data from 2019. To Tidy the data, I removed the id columns and rows with a value of 0 in them for number_of_reviews. I will to compare number of reviews with other variables to see if reviews have any effect whether it is the independent or dependent variable. By looking at the summary table I could also investigate the number of reviews for each neighborhood_group and neighborhood. I will also be looking into the date-time variable to see if the other values change in comparison to it.
Time Dependent Visualization
ggplot(Air_Bnb, aes(x = last_review, y = number_of_reviews)) +geom_line() +labs(title ="Number of Reviews for Airbnb Listings", x ="Date of Last Review", y ="Number of Reviews") +theme_bw()
Here my graph shows the number of reviews over the dat of last review of all data instances. I can conclude from the graph that if the date of last review is closer to the present then it is more likely that it has more reviews than other data instances.
Visualizing Part-Whole Relationships
ggplot(Air_Bnb) +geom_bin2d(mapping =aes(x = latitude, y = longitude))
ggplot(Air_Bnb) +geom_point(mapping =aes(x = latitude, y = longitude, color = room_type))
Here I have two graphs that both represent that latitude and longitude of each location. The first graph shows the density of the locations of the air BnBs. I can see that most of the Air Bnb locations are clustered around 40.7 latitude. The second graph shows within those densities which room type is most common. I can conclude that as longitude increases, the type of room becomes dominated by Private room. This could mean that as we move up north there should be more Private rooms.
Source Code
---title: "Challenge_6_Jyoti Rani"author: "Jyoti Rani"description: "Visualizing Time and Relationships"date: "08/24/2022"format: html: toc: true code-copy: true code-tools: truecategories: - challenge_6 - air_bnb---```{r setup, include=FALSE}library(tidyverse)library(ggplot2)library(readxl)library(summarytools)knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo =TRUE)``````{r}Air_Bnb <-read_csv("_data/AB_NYC_2019.csv", col_names =c("del", "name", "del", "host_name","neighbourhood_group", "neighbourhood", "latitude", "longitude", "room_type", "price", "minimum_nights", "number_of_reviews", "last_review", "reviews_per_month", "calculated_host_listings_count", "availability_365" ), skip=1) %>%select(!starts_with("del")) %>%drop_na(reviews_per_month)Air_Bnbprint(dfSummary(Air_Bnb, varnumbers =FALSE,plain.ascii =FALSE, style ="grid", graph.magnif =0.70, valid.col =FALSE),method ='render',table.classes ='table-condensed')```### Briefly describe the dataWe have NYC Air BnB data from 2019. To Tidy the data, I removed the id columns and rows with a value of 0 in them for number_of_reviews. I will to compare number of reviews with other variables to see if reviews have any effect whether it is the independent or dependent variable. By looking at the summary table I could also investigate the number of reviews for each neighborhood_group and neighborhood. I will also be looking into the date-time variable to see if the other values change in comparison to it.## Time Dependent Visualization```{r}ggplot(Air_Bnb, aes(x = last_review, y = number_of_reviews)) +geom_line() +labs(title ="Number of Reviews for Airbnb Listings", x ="Date of Last Review", y ="Number of Reviews") +theme_bw()```Here my graph shows the number of reviews over the dat of last review of all data instances. I can conclude from the graph that if the date of last review is closer to the present then it is more likely that it has more reviews than other data instances. ## Visualizing Part-Whole Relationships```{r}ggplot(Air_Bnb) +geom_bin2d(mapping =aes(x = latitude, y = longitude))ggplot(Air_Bnb) +geom_point(mapping =aes(x = latitude, y = longitude, color = room_type))```Here I have two graphs that both represent that latitude and longitude of each location. The first graph shows the density of the locations of the air BnBs. I can see that most of the Air Bnb locations are clustered around 40.7 latitude. The second graph shows within those densities which room type is most common. I can conclude that as longitude increases, the type of room becomes dominated by Private room. This could mean that as we move up north there should be more Private rooms.
